I. Common Markets
 

A. Traditional Roles of HBCUs

In its comprehensive response to the question "Why are HBCUs important?", the Website of the United Negro College Fund (UNCF) notes that:

"HBCUs graduate far more than their share of African American professionals. While the 105 HBCUs represent just 3% of the nation’s institutions of higher learning, they graduate nearly one-quarter of African Americans who earn undergraduate degrees. Put another way, HBCUs graduate 75% more of their African American students than other schools do."

This statement is illustrated by the data in:

As the reader will see upon clicking this link, the table shows the number of Bachelors degrees awarded to African-Americans by the fifty accredited U.S. colleges and universities that awarded the most Bachelors degrees to African-Americans in all fields in the 2003/2004 academic year. Twelve out of the top fifteen institutions were HBCUs.

B. Emerging Roles of For-Profit Institutions

Unfortunately, job markets in the current millennium do not place equal value on all fields of study. Accordingly the DLL examined the distribution of degrees awarded at the bachelors level in two of the most information-technology intensive fields of study: business and computers. They were selected because many potential partners in the for-profit sector advertise extensive course offerings in these fields. The number of bachelors degrees awarded in 2003/2004 to African-American business majors is shown in:

  • Table A2 -- Bachelors Degrees in Business

As the reader will see upon clicking this URL, only two of the top 15 schools (FAMU and Howard) are HBCUs, and two of the top fifteen are for-profit institutions (Strayer University and Monroe College). Indeed the top two for-profit operations produced almost as many graduates (531) as the top two HBCUs (581). Overall, however, UNCF's assertion is still supported by this data because the thirteen HBCUs in the top 50 produced 2283 of the 8989 graduates from all 50 institutions, i.e., 25 percent.

This situation is somewhat different for bachelors in computer-related fields, as shown in:

  • Table A3 -- Bachelors Degrees in Computers/Information Systems

Table A3 shows that the for-profit institutions rack up five out of the top six positions. The top five for-profits graduated more than twice as many African-Americans (842) in these critical fields as did all of the top five HBCUs (384). Indeed the thirteen for-profits that appear on this top 50 list graduated more African-Americans (1115) than all of the twenty-one HBCUs (996 on this top 50 list. In other words, the for-profit institutions produced 38 percent of the total (2919) number of African-American graduates produced by the top 50 colleges and universities -- a result that will probably surprise most of the readers of this report.

Moving up to the Masters degrees, we find only two HBCUs (Prairie View and FAMU) in the top 15 for all degrees awarded in 2003/2004, but three for-profits score at this level (Phoenix, Strayer, and DeVry), as shown in:

The ten HBCUs on the top 50 list produced a total of 2625 graduates, which is only 16 percent of the 16133 African-American graduates produced by all 50 schools on the list. This indicates that HBCUs play a less significant role at the Masters level than at the Bachelors level. Indeed, when we focus on the business Masters, the union card of America's corporate managers, the data in the next table not only confirms relatively lower contributions from HBCUs, it also shows that for-profit institutions are, again, producing a surprisingly high percentage of the nation's African-American graduates:

  • Table B2 -- Masters Degrees in Business

There are seven for-profits in the top 50, but only three HBCUs. Furthermore, the for-profits produced more than four times as many African-American business graduates (1471) as the HBCUs (341). Overall the for-profits produced 23 percent of the total (6334). In other words, the much publicized MBA degree that superstar basketball player Shaquille O'Neal received from the University of Phoenix in 2005 (one year later) was just the glittering tip of a very broad iceberg. Similar results are observed for computer-related Masters degrees, as shown in:

  • Table B3 -- Masters Degrees in Computers/Information Systems

The seven for-profits on this list produced 2.6 times as many graduates as the five HBCUs. Overall the for-profits accounted for 21 percent of the graduates produced by all of the schools on this list.

Summarizing these tables, it can be said that in business and in computer-related studies at both the Bachelors and Masters levels, a number of for-profit institutions have taken on roles traditionally associated with HBCUs as the producers of disproportionately large percentages of African-American graduates.

© 2006 -- Digital Learning Lab (DLL)